On 04/05/18 17:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
> While the main problem to be addressed here is the issue of what so far
> was named "vmcb_in_sync" starting out with the wrong value (should have
> been true instead of false, to prevent performing a VMSAVE without ever
> having VMLOADed the vCPU's state), go
While the main problem to be addressed here is the issue of what so far
was named "vmcb_in_sync" starting out with the wrong value (should have
been true instead of false, to prevent performing a VMSAVE without ever
having VMLOADed the vCPU's state), go a step further and make the
sync-ed state a t
