On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 01:40:06AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 30.11.18 at 17:33, wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:26:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
> >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
> >> @@ -742,6 +742,16 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pc
> >>
> >
>>> On 30.11.18 at 17:33, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:26:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>> @@ -742,6 +742,16 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pc
>>
>> *desc = entry;
>> /* Restore the original MSI enabled bits */
>>> On 30.11.18 at 13:40, wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:52:39AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 29.11.18 at 18:33, wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:26:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>> >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>> >> @@ -742,6 +742,16 @@ static int
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:26:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Which, on x86, requires fiddling with the INTx bit in PCI config space,
> since for internally used MSI we can't delegate this to Dom0.
>
> ns16550_init_postirq() also needs (benign) re-ordering of its
> operations.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:52:39AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 29.11.18 at 18:33, wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:26:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
> >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
> >> @@ -742,6 +742,16 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pc
> >>
> >
>>> On 29.11.18 at 18:33, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:26:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c
>> @@ -742,6 +742,16 @@ static int msi_capability_init(struct pc
>>
>> *desc = entry;
>> /* Restore the original MSI enabled bits */
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:26:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Which, on x86, requires fiddling with the INTx bit in PCI config space,
> since for internally used MSI we can't delegate this to Dom0.
>
> ns16550_init_postirq() also needs (benign) re-ordering of its
> operations.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Which, on x86, requires fiddling with the INTx bit in PCI config space,
since for internally used MSI we can't delegate this to Dom0.
ns16550_init_postirq() also needs (benign) re-ordering of its
operations.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
v2: Re-base.
--- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown
+