On 16/07/18 10:37, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 09:03:02PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> More than the bottom two bits are now defined, and the MSR policy work has
>> shown that using non-architectural representations turns out to be
>> problematic
>> for more than just asm co
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 09:03:02PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> More than the bottom two bits are now defined, and the MSR policy work has
> shown that using non-architectural representations turns out to be problematic
> for more than just asm code. As the architectural representation is the
> e
>>> On 13.07.18 at 22:03, wrote:
> More than the bottom two bits are now defined, and the MSR policy work has
> shown that using non-architectural representations turns out to be
> problematic
> for more than just asm code. As the architectural representation is the
> expected default, we don't
More than the bottom two bits are now defined, and the MSR policy work has
shown that using non-architectural representations turns out to be problematic
for more than just asm code. As the architectural representation is the
expected default, we don't need to justify why we are using it.
Signed-