On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 12:02:36PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 14/02/2019 12:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.02.19 at 12:54, wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 04:49:21AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 14.02.19 at 12:10, wrote:
> From: Andrew Cooper
>
> dom0_const
On 14/02/2019 12:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.02.19 at 12:54, wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 04:49:21AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.02.19 at 12:10, wrote:
From: Andrew Cooper
dom0_construct_pv() has logic to transition dom0 into a compat domain when
booting
>>> On 14.02.19 at 12:54, wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 04:49:21AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 14.02.19 at 12:10, wrote:
>> > From: Andrew Cooper
>> >
>> > dom0_construct_pv() has logic to transition dom0 into a compat domain when
>> > booting an ELF32 image.
>> >
>> > One aspect wh
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 04:49:21AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 14.02.19 at 12:10, wrote:
> > From: Andrew Cooper
> >
> > dom0_construct_pv() has logic to transition dom0 into a compat domain when
> > booting an ELF32 image.
> >
> > One aspect which is missing is the CPUID policy recalcul
>>> On 14.02.19 at 12:10, wrote:
> From: Andrew Cooper
>
> dom0_construct_pv() has logic to transition dom0 into a compat domain when
> booting an ELF32 image.
>
> One aspect which is missing is the CPUID policy recalculation, meaning that a
> 32bit dom0 sees a 64bit policy, which differ by the
From: Andrew Cooper
dom0_construct_pv() has logic to transition dom0 into a compat domain when
booting an ELF32 image.
One aspect which is missing is the CPUID policy recalculation, meaning that a
32bit dom0 sees a 64bit policy, which differ by the Long Mode feature flag in
particular. Another
