On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:00:41PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Backend domain may be independently destroyed - there is no
> synchronization of libxl structures (including /libxl tree) elsewhere.
> Backend might also remove the device info from its backend xenstore
> subtree on its o
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:00:41PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Backend domain may be independently destroyed - there is no
> synchronization of libxl structures (including /libxl tree) elsewhere.
> Backend might also remove the device info from its backend xenstore
> subtree on its o
Backend domain may be independently destroyed - there is no
synchronization of libxl structures (including /libxl tree) elsewhere.
Backend might also remove the device info from its backend xenstore
subtree on its own.
We have various cases (not comprehensive list):
- both frontend and backend o
