On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 26.02.19 at 20:20, wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >> Having written all that down (what a palaver), we can see that your
> >> cast, above, is a breach of the rules. Instead you can just pass the
> >> struct abstract_alt_instr*
>>> On 26.02.19 at 20:20, wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Having written all that down (what a palaver), we can see that your
>> cast, above, is a breach of the rules. Instead you can just pass the
>> struct abstract_alt_instr*, and all is well. Then you don't need a
>> comme
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Having written all that down (what a palaver), we can see that your
> cast, above, is a breach of the rules. Instead you can just pass the
> struct abstract_alt_instr*, and all is well. Then you don't need a
> comment at the use site, either, since you ar
Stefano Stabellini writes ("[PATCH v10 3/6] xen/arm: use DEFINE_SYMBOL as
required"):
> Use DEFINE_SYMBOL and the two static inline functions that come with it
> for comparisons and subtractions of:
>
> __init_begin, __init_end, __alt_instructions, __alt_instructions_end,
> __per_cpu_start, __per
Use DEFINE_SYMBOL and the two static inline functions that come with it
for comparisons and subtractions of:
__init_begin, __init_end, __alt_instructions, __alt_instructions_end,
__per_cpu_start, __per_cpu_data_end, _splatform, _eplatform, _sdevice,
_edevice, _asdevice, _aedevice.
Use explicit ca
