>>> On 28.02.19 at 01:05, wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 26.02.19 at 19:43, wrote:
>> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> >> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v10 2/6] xen: introduce DEFINE_SYMBOL"):
>> >> > On 26.02.19 at 17:46, wrote:
>> >> > > I am not aware
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 26.02.19 at 19:43, wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v10 2/6] xen: introduce DEFINE_SYMBOL"):
> >> > On 26.02.19 at 17:46, wrote:
> >> > > I am not aware of a standard C type which could be used
>>> On 26.02.19 at 19:43, wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v10 2/6] xen: introduce DEFINE_SYMBOL"):
>> > On 26.02.19 at 17:46, wrote:
>> > > I am not aware of a standard C type which could be used instead of
>> > > this struct. But I think you c
>>> On 26.02.19 at 19:54, wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 25.02.19 at 21:50, wrote:
>> > --- a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
>> > +++ b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
>> > @@ -99,6 +99,38 @@
>> > __asm__ ("" : "=r"(__ptr) : "0"(ptr)); \
>> > (typeof(ptr)) (__ptr
>>> On 26.02.19 at 18:32, wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v10 2/6] xen: introduce DEFINE_SYMBOL"):
>> On 26.02.19 at 17:46, wrote:
>> > I am not aware of a standard C type which could be used instead of
>> > this struct. But I think you can use the `packed' attribute to get
>> > the rig
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 25.02.19 at 21:50, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
> > @@ -99,6 +99,38 @@
> > __asm__ ("" : "=r"(__ptr) : "0"(ptr)); \
> > (typeof(ptr)) (__ptr + (off)); })
> >
> > +
> > +/*
> > + *
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v10 2/6] xen: introduce DEFINE_SYMBOL"):
> > On 26.02.19 at 17:46, wrote:
> > > I am not aware of a standard C type which could be used instead of
> > > this struct. But I think you can use the `packed' attribute to get
> >
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH v10 2/6] xen: introduce DEFINE_SYMBOL"):
> On 26.02.19 at 17:46, wrote:
> > I am not aware of a standard C type which could be used instead of
> > this struct. But I think you can use the `packed' attribute to get
> > the right behaviour. The GCC manual says:
> >
>>> On 26.02.19 at 17:46, wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("[PATCH v10 2/6] xen: introduce DEFINE_SYMBOL"):
>> +/*
>> + * Declare start and end array variables in C corresponding to existing
>> + * linker symbols.
>> + *
>> + * Two static inline functions are declared to do comparisons and
>> +
Stefano Stabellini writes ("[PATCH v10 2/6] xen: introduce DEFINE_SYMBOL"):
> Introduce a MACRO to be used to declare array variables corresponding to
> linker symbols, plus two static inline functions to be used for
> comparing and subtracting pointers with the linker symbols.
>
> Note that the s
>>> On 25.02.19 at 21:50, wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,38 @@
> __asm__ ("" : "=r"(__ptr) : "0"(ptr)); \
> (typeof(ptr)) (__ptr + (off)); })
>
> +
> +/*
> + * Declare start and end array variables in C corresponding to
Introduce a MACRO to be used to declare array variables corresponding to
linker symbols, plus two static inline functions to be used for
comparing and subtracting pointers with the linker symbols.
Note that the start and end symbols are declared of different types to
help avoid errors and misusing
12 matches
Mail list logo
