On 26/03/18 14:19, Manish Jaggi wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> I have a query on this patch. The original patch was using these
> functions so it was ok to make them static.
> But this patch is not touching the xen vgic code similar to what your
> patch did.
>
> Will it be ok to merge this patch with
>
Hi Marc,
I have a query on this patch. The original patch was using these
functions so it was ok to make them static.
But this patch is not touching the xen vgic code similar to what your
patch did.
Will it be ok to merge this patch with
https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg587089.htm
This patch is ported to xen from linux commit
63000dd8006dc987db31ba670edc23142ea91e01
As we're about to access the Active Priority registers a lot more,
let's define accessors that take the register number as a parameter.
This patch only has accessors, another patch will have register trap handl
