On 16/02/18 16:00, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 11:38 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 16/02/18 11:31, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 04:06 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 16.02.18 at 11:33, wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 06:33 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 11:38 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 16/02/18 11:31, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 04:06 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > On 16.02.18 at 11:33, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 06:33 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 08.02.18 at
On 16/02/18 11:31, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 04:06 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 16.02.18 at 11:33, wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 06:33 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 08.02.18 at 11:23, wrote:
> uint64_t val;
> + int rc;
>
> - if (rdmsr_safe(MS
>>> On 16.02.18 at 12:31, wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 04:06 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > > > On 16.02.18 at 11:33, wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 06:33 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > > > > > On 08.02.18 at 11:23, wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >uint64_t val;
>> > > > + int rc
On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 04:06 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 16.02.18 at 11:33, wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 06:33 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > On 08.02.18 at 11:23, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > uint64_t val;
> > > > + int rc;
> > > >
> > > > - if (rdmsr_saf
>>> On 16.02.18 at 11:33, wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 06:33 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > > > On 08.02.18 at 11:23, wrote:
>> >uint64_t val;
>> > + int rc;
>> >
>> > - if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_INTEL_PLATFORM_INFO, val) ||
>> > + if ((rc = rdmsr_safe(MSR_INTEL_PLATFORM_INFO, val)) == 0)
>>
On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 06:33 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 08.02.18 at 11:23, wrote:
> >
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
> > @@ -118,9 +118,18 @@ void (* __read_mostly ctxt_switch_masking)(const
> > struct vcpu *next);
> >
> > bool __init probe_cp
>>> On 08.02.18 at 11:23, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c
> @@ -118,9 +118,18 @@ void (* __read_mostly ctxt_switch_masking)(const struct
> vcpu *next);
>
> bool __init probe_cpuid_faulting(void)
> {
> + struct msr_domain_policy *dp = &raw_msr_dom
On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 11:21 +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 10:23:21AM +, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> > +static void __init calculate_host_policy(void)
> > +{
> > +struct msr_domain_policy *dp = &host_msr_domain_policy;
> > +
> > +*dp = raw_msr_domain_policy;
>
> hos
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 10:23:21AM +, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> +static void __init calculate_host_policy(void)
> +{
> +struct msr_domain_policy *dp = &host_msr_domain_policy;
> +
> +*dp = raw_msr_domain_policy;
host_msr_domain_policy = raw_msr_domain_policy;
Should work AFAICT.
> diff
On 08/02/18 10:23, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> Raw policy contains the actual values from H/W MSRs. Add PLATFORM_INFO
> msr to the policy during probe_cpuid_faulting().
>
> Host policy might have certain features disabled if Xen decides not
> to use them. For now, make Host policy equal to Raw policy.
>
Raw policy contains the actual values from H/W MSRs. Add PLATFORM_INFO
msr to the policy during probe_cpuid_faulting().
Host policy might have certain features disabled if Xen decides not
to use them. For now, make Host policy equal to Raw policy.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Dyasli
---
v1: Decided to
12 matches
Mail list logo
