Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.11 v2 0/3] x86: XSA-267 follow-up

2018-06-26 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 26.06.18 at 09:39, wrote: > On 26/06/18 08:24, Jan Beulich wrote: >> The first patch alone should be sufficient to address an issue with the >> XSA-267 changes, causing a BUG_ON() to be triggered. The other two >> patches would, afaict, each individually also have avoided the issue, >> henc

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.11 v2 0/3] x86: XSA-267 follow-up

2018-06-26 Thread Juergen Gross
On 26/06/18 08:24, Jan Beulich wrote: > The first patch alone should be sufficient to address an issue with the > XSA-267 changes, causing a BUG_ON() to be triggered. The other two > patches would, afaict, each individually also have avoided the issue, > hence I'm also including them here. While th

[Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.11 v2 0/3] x86: XSA-267 follow-up

2018-06-25 Thread Jan Beulich
The first patch alone should be sufficient to address an issue with the XSA-267 changes, causing a BUG_ON() to be triggered. The other two patches would, afaict, each individually also have avoided the issue, hence I'm also including them here. While the first patch obviously is a strong candidate