Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11 0/2] SUPPORT.md matrix fixes (series
"C")"):
> Aah, so on ARM we have no dom0 support?
No, that is a mistake.
Ian.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailma
On 25/04/18 15:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11 0/2] SUPPORT.md matrix fixes
> (series "C")"):
>> On 25/04/18 15:43, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> 2. Backport all renames / reorganizations to all supported versions
>>
>> +1
>>
>> As this will only be more specific it
Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11 0/2] SUPPORT.md matrix fixes (series
"C")"):
> On 25/04/18 15:43, George Dunlap wrote:
> > 2. Backport all renames / reorganizations to all supported versions
>
> +1
>
> As this will only be more specific it is a win. Again above example:
> How would yo
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11 0/2] SUPPORT.md matrix fixes (series
"C")"):
> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11 0/2] SUPPORT.md matrix fixes
> (series "C")"):
> > 2. Backport all renames / reorganizations to all supported versions
...
> > I was initially opposed to #2, but I th
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11 0/2] SUPPORT.md matrix fixes (series
"C")"):
> Right, so there are four options:
>
> 1. Never rename / reorganize SUPPORT.md categories
This is clearly unworkable.
> 3. Introduce some sort of “mapping” of options so that the table
> generator can corre
On 25/04/18 15:43, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 25, 2018, at 2:32 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>
>> On 25/04/18 15:21, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11 0/2] SUPPORT.md matrix fixes
>>> (series "C")"):
Not related to these patches, but:
SUPPORT.
> On Apr 25, 2018, at 2:32 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>
> On 25/04/18 15:21, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11 0/2] SUPPORT.md matrix fixes
>> (series "C")"):
>>> Not related to these patches, but:
>>>
>>> SUPPORT.md of 4.10 seems to have some entries different to
On 25/04/18 15:21, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11 0/2] SUPPORT.md matrix fixes
> (series "C")"):
>> Not related to these patches, but:
>>
>> SUPPORT.md of 4.10 seems to have some entries different to 4.11. Do we
>> want to change those? This might result in a more
Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11 0/2] SUPPORT.md matrix fixes (series
"C")"):
> Not related to these patches, but:
>
> SUPPORT.md of 4.10 seems to have some entries different to 4.11. Do we
> want to change those? This might result in a more readable table.
>
> e.g.:
>
> 4.10: ### x86
On 25/04/18 15:04, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I was just testing the results of my backports of the SUPPORT.md
> series to 4.10 - just sent, under the Subject line:
> [PATCH for-4.10 0/9] SUPPORT.md backports to support matrix generation
>
> I found a bug in the support matrix generator. Sadly the
I was just testing the results of my backports of the SUPPORT.md
series to 4.10 - just sent, under the Subject line:
[PATCH for-4.10 0/9] SUPPORT.md backports to support matrix generation
I found a bug in the support matrix generator. Sadly the bug was not
evident without the backported chang
11 matches
Mail list logo
