On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 06:21:04AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.01.18 at 14:06, wrote:
> > +long rc;
> > +
> > +if ( !vcpu_info )
> > +{
> > +this_cpu(vcpu_info) = &XEN_shared_info->vcpu_info[vcpu];
> > +return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +if ( test_bit(vcpu, v
>>> On 04.01.18 at 14:06, wrote:
> So that the limit of XEN_LEGACY_MAX_VCPUS can be lifted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
> ---
> Should be moved earlier maybe?
Especially the changes to time.c undoing/redoing earlier changes
suggests so.
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/xen.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/
From: Roger Pau Monne
So that the limit of XEN_LEGACY_MAX_VCPUS can be lifted.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
---
Should be moved earlier maybe?
---
xen/arch/x86/guest/xen.c | 61 +--
xen/arch/x86/time.c | 11 ++-
xen/include/a
