On 26.03.2020 15:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 25/03/2020 14:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Introduce a check missing from the old code, that total_size is a multiple
>>> of
>>> 1024 bytes,
>> Where is this documented? The rather brief section in SDM vol 3 doesn't
>> mention anything like this.
>
> I
On 25/03/2020 14:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Introduce a check missing from the old code, that total_size is a multiple of
>> 1024 bytes,
> Where is this documented? The rather brief section in SDM vol 3 doesn't
> mention anything like this.
It is in the middle of the final paragraph of 9.11.1 Micro
On 23.03.2020 11:17, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Rewrite the size checks in a way which which doesn't depend on Xen being
> compiled as 64bit.
One too many "which"?
> Introduce a check missing from the old code, that total_size is a multiple of
> 1024 bytes,
Where is this documented? The rather brief
Rewrite the size checks in a way which which doesn't depend on Xen being
compiled as 64bit.
Introduce a check missing from the old code, that total_size is a multiple of
1024 bytes, and drop unnecessarily defines/macros/structures.
No practical change in behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper