On 07.01.2020 19:07, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 07/01/2020 16:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.01.2020 16:54, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
>>> @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
>>> /* Critical region wi
On 07/01/2020 16:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.01.2020 16:54, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Now that NULL will fault at boot, there is no need for a special constant to
>> signify "current not set up yet".
> Mind making this "... no strong need ..."? The benefit of an easily
> recognizable value goes aw
On 06.01.2020 16:54, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Now that NULL will fault at boot, there is no need for a special constant to
> signify "current not set up yet".
Mind making this "... no strong need ..."? The benefit of an easily
recognizable value goes away, but I guess we'll be fine without.
IOW I'm
Now that NULL will fault at boot, there is no need for a special constant to
signify "current not set up yet".
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Wei Liu
CC: Roger Pau Monné
---
xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/domain_page.c| 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/setup.c
