Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] x86/shadow: ignore sh_pin() failure in one more case

2017-12-20 Thread Tim Deegan
At 08:06 -0700 on 12 Dec (1513065979), Jan Beulich wrote: > Following what we've already done in the XSA-250 fix, convert another > sh_pin() caller to no longer fail the higher level operation if pinning > fails, as pinning is a performance optimization only in those places. > > Suggested-by: Tim

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] x86/shadow: ignore sh_pin() failure in one more case

2017-12-12 Thread Jan Beulich
Following what we've already done in the XSA-250 fix, convert another sh_pin() caller to no longer fail the higher level operation if pinning fails, as pinning is a performance optimization only in those places. Suggested-by: Tim Deegan Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- Would it be worth making sh_