On 15/10/18 11:40, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 08:56:22AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 04.10.18 at 17:43, wrote:
>>> Instead of trying to split up entry.S and compat/entry.S, simply
>>> provide some stubs for them.
>> I'm not convinced; I'd much rather see the call sites recogni
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 08:56:22AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.10.18 at 17:43, wrote:
> > Instead of trying to split up entry.S and compat/entry.S, simply
> > provide some stubs for them.
>
> I'm not convinced; I'd much rather see the call sites recognizably
> compiled out with !PV. I'm
>>> On 04.10.18 at 17:43, wrote:
> Instead of trying to split up entry.S and compat/entry.S, simply
> provide some stubs for them.
I'm not convinced; I'd much rather see the call sites recognizably
compiled out with !PV. I'm curious what Andrew thinks here.
Jan
___
Instead of trying to split up entry.S and compat/entry.S, simply
provide some stubs for them.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
xen/arch/x86/x86_64/Makefile | 5 +-
xen/arch/x86/x86_64/no-pv.c | 41 +-
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 xen/a
