On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 07:13:49PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> set_max_evtchn is somewhat weird. It was introduced with the event_fifo work,
> but has never been used. Still, it is a bounding on resources consumed by the
> event channel infrastructure, and should be part of createdomain, rather
> On 19. Mar 2018, at 19:13, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> set_max_evtchn is somewhat weird. It was introduced with the event_fifo work,
> but has never been used. Still, it is a bounding on resources consumed by the
> event channel infrastructure, and should be part of createdomain, rather than
>
On 03/19/2018 03:13 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
set_max_evtchn is somewhat weird. It was introduced with the event_fifo work,
but has never been used. Still, it is a bounding on resources consumed by the
event channel infrastructure, and should be part of createdomain, rather than
editable after t
set_max_evtchn is somewhat weird. It was introduced with the event_fifo work,
but has never been used. Still, it is a bounding on resources consumed by the
event channel infrastructure, and should be part of createdomain, rather than
editable after the fact.
Drop XEN_DOMCTL_set_max_evtchn comple
