Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/41] scsi: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

2018-12-18 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
On 12/18/18 9:45 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: If you haven't received feedback on a patch you should poke the relevant driver maintainer. Got it. Will do so. Thanks -- Gustavo ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://li

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/41] scsi: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

2018-12-18 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Hi Gustavo, > Only 8 out the 41 patches in this series have been applied so far. I applied the patches that got acked or reviewed by their respective driver maintainers. If you haven't received feedback on a patch you should poke the relevant driver maintainer. -- Martin K. Petersen Orac

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/41] scsi: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

2018-12-18 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
Hi Martin, Friendly ping: Only 8 out the 41 patches in this series have been applied so far. I wonder if you could apply the rest of this series, except: [PATCH 02/41] scsi: NCR5380: Mark expected switch fall-through (I'll send a v2 of this patch) Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/27/18 10:18 PM, Gu

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/41] scsi: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

2018-11-27 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, this patchset aims to mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. I reviewed case by case and concluded that each of them is an intentional fall-through. However, it doesn't hurt that the maintainers and supporters of each driver tak