Hi,
On 28/04/18 10:08, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
> While working on MVEBU uart driver, Julien pointed out that (uart->irq > 0)
> check is unnecessary during irq set up.if ever there is an invalid irq, driver
> initialization itself would be bailed out from platform_get_irq.
>
> This patch would rem
Hi,
On 30/04/18 09:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.04.18 at 11:08, wrote:
While working on MVEBU uart driver, Julien pointed out that (uart->irq > 0)
check is unnecessary during irq set up.if ever there is an invalid irq, driver
initialization itself would be bailed out from platform_get_irq.
Th
>>> On 28.04.18 at 11:08, wrote:
> While working on MVEBU uart driver, Julien pointed out that (uart->irq > 0)
> check is unnecessary during irq set up.if ever there is an invalid irq, driver
> initialization itself would be bailed out from platform_get_irq.
>
> This patch would remove similar ch
While working on MVEBU uart driver, Julien pointed out that (uart->irq > 0)
check is unnecessary during irq set up.if ever there is an invalid irq, driver
initialization itself would be bailed out from platform_get_irq.
This patch would remove similar check for other uart drivers present in XEN.
