On 13/02/18 17:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Along the lines of commit 7226486767 ("x86/srat: fix the end pfn check
> in valid_numa_range()") nodes_cover_memory() also doesn't consistently
> use "end": It's set to an inclusive value initially, but then compared
> to the exclusive "end" field of struct n
Along the lines of commit 7226486767 ("x86/srat: fix the end pfn check
in valid_numa_range()") nodes_cover_memory() also doesn't consistently
use "end": It's set to an inclusive value initially, but then compared
to the exclusive "end" field of struct node and also possibly set to
nodes[j].start, m
