>>> On 31.01.19 at 14:36, wrote:
> On 31/01/2019 10:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 30.01.19 at 21:21, wrote:
>>> On 14/01/2019 12:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 14.01.19 at 13:00, wrote:
> On 14/01/2019 11:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> First of all a PCLMULQDQ dependency was missing enti
On 31/01/2019 10:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.01.19 at 21:21, wrote:
>> On 14/01/2019 12:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.01.19 at 13:00, wrote:
On 14/01/2019 11:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> First of all a PCLMULQDQ dependency was missing entirely. Add it as well
> as AESNI and S
>>> On 30.01.19 at 21:21, wrote:
> On 14/01/2019 12:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.01.19 at 13:00, wrote:
>>> On 14/01/2019 11:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
First of all a PCLMULQDQ dependency was missing entirely. Add it as well
as AESNI and SHA to SSE2, as all of them act on vectors of i
On 14/01/2019 12:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.01.19 at 13:00, wrote:
>> On 14/01/2019 11:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> First of all a PCLMULQDQ dependency was missing entirely. Add it as well
>>> as AESNI and SHA to SSE2, as all of them act on vectors of integers,
>>> whereas plain SSE supports
>>> On 14.01.19 at 13:00, wrote:
> On 14/01/2019 11:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> First of all a PCLMULQDQ dependency was missing entirely. Add it as well
>> as AESNI and SHA to SSE2, as all of them act on vectors of integers,
>> whereas plain SSE supports vectors of single precision floats only. This
On 14/01/2019 11:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> First of all a PCLMULQDQ dependency was missing entirely. Add it as well
> as AESNI and SHA to SSE2, as all of them act on vectors of integers,
> whereas plain SSE supports vectors of single precision floats only. This
> is in line with how e.g. binutils an
First of all a PCLMULQDQ dependency was missing entirely. Add it as well
as AESNI and SHA to SSE2, as all of them act on vectors of integers,
whereas plain SSE supports vectors of single precision floats only. This
is in line with how e.g. binutils and gcc treat them.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
-
