> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 04 December 2017 10:26
> To: xen-devel
> Cc: Paul Durrant
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/HVM: tighten re-issue check in hvmemul_do_io()
>
> I'm not sure why we had left out the address check in case of indirect
> accesse
I'm not sure why we had left out the address check in case of indirect
accesses (where "data" holds a guest physical address).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
@@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ static int hvmemul_do_io(
(p.count > *reps
