On 05/10/18 12:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.10.18 at 13:14, wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:11:55AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Older gcc, despite eliminating pci_clean_dpci_irqs() when !HVM, does
>>> not manage to also eliminate pci_clean_dpci_irq(). Cope with this.
>> Would be helpfu
>>> On 05.10.18 at 13:14, wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:11:55AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Older gcc, despite eliminating pci_clean_dpci_irqs() when !HVM, does
>> not manage to also eliminate pci_clean_dpci_irq(). Cope with this.
>
> Would be helpful to call out the version of gcc is the
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:11:55AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Older gcc, despite eliminating pci_clean_dpci_irqs() when !HVM, does
> not manage to also eliminate pci_clean_dpci_irq(). Cope with this.
Would be helpful to call out the version of gcc is the commit message.
Reviewed-by: Wei Liu
__
Older gcc, despite eliminating pci_clean_dpci_irqs() when !HVM, does
not manage to also eliminate pci_clean_dpci_irq(). Cope with this.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/irq.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/irq.h
@@ -180,7 +180,15 @@ int pt_pirq_iterate(struct domain *d,