>>> On 25.02.19 at 14:33, wrote:
> On 25/02/2019 12:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.02.19 at 12:52, wrote:
>>> On 25/02/2019 11:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
Don't emit the "ignored" warning when there's no placement specification
and the tail of the specified option is actually empty.
On 25/02/2019 12:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.02.19 at 12:52, wrote:
>> On 25/02/2019 11:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Don't emit the "ignored" warning when there's no placement specification
>>> and the tail of the specified option is actually empty.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>> What
>>> On 25.02.19 at 12:52, wrote:
> On 25/02/2019 11:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Don't emit the "ignored" warning when there's no placement specification
>> and the tail of the specified option is actually empty.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> What command line triggers this?
crashkernel=1G-
On 25/02/2019 11:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Don't emit the "ignored" warning when there's no placement specification
> and the tail of the specified option is actually empty.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
What command line triggers this?
~Andrew
>
> --- a/xen/common/kexec.c
> +++ b/xen/common/ke
Don't emit the "ignored" warning when there's no placement specification
and the tail of the specified option is actually empty.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/common/kexec.c
+++ b/xen/common/kexec.c
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int __init parse_crashkernel(cons
kexec_crash_area
