On 03/07/18 11:47, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 03/07/18 07:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.07.18 at 22:28, wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 02:47:42PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 06/26/2018 10:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.06.18 at 10:43, wrote:
>> On 26/06/18 08:24, J
On 03/07/18 07:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.07.18 at 22:28, wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 02:47:42PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
On 06/26/2018 10:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.06.18 at 10:43, wrote:
On 26/06/18 08:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
@@ -698,26 +701,30 @@ static void printk_start_of
>>> On 02.07.18 at 22:28, wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 02:47:42PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 06/26/2018 10:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > > > > On 26.06.18 at 10:43, wrote:
>> > > On 26/06/18 08:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > > > @@ -698,26 +701,30 @@ static void printk_start_of_line(const
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 02:47:42PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 06/26/2018 10:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > On 26.06.18 at 10:43, wrote:
> > > On 26/06/18 08:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > @@ -698,26 +701,30 @@ static void printk_start_of_line(const c
> > > >case TSM_DATE_MS:
> >
Hi,
On 07/02/2018 02:47 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 06/26/2018 10:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.06.18 at 10:43, wrote:
On 26/06/18 08:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
During early boot timestamps aren't very useful, as they're all zero
(in "boot" mode) or absent altogether (in "date" and "datems" mod
On 06/26/2018 10:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.06.18 at 10:43, wrote:
On 26/06/18 08:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
During early boot timestamps aren't very useful, as they're all zero
(in "boot" mode) or absent altogether (in "date" and "datems" modes).
Log "boot" format timestamps when the date fo
>>> On 26.06.18 at 10:43, wrote:
> On 26/06/18 08:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> During early boot timestamps aren't very useful, as they're all zero
>> (in "boot" mode) or absent altogether (in "date" and "datems" modes).
>> Log "boot" format timestamps when the date formats aren't available yet,
>> a
Hi Jan,
On 26/06/18 08:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
During early boot timestamps aren't very useful, as they're all zero
(in "boot" mode) or absent altogether (in "date" and "datems" modes).
Log "boot" format timestamps when the date formats aren't available yet,
and log raw timestamps when boot ones
During early boot timestamps aren't very useful, as they're all zero
(in "boot" mode) or absent altogether (in "date" and "datems" modes).
Log "boot" format timestamps when the date formats aren't available yet,
and log raw timestamps when boot ones are still all zero. Also add a
"raw" mode.
Signe
