Hi Ayan,
On 25/04/2023 17:16, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
>
> On 24/04/2023 13:08, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> Hi Ayan,
>
> Hi Michal,
>
> A clarification.
>
>>
>> On 13/04/2023 19:37, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
>>>
>>> Some Arm based hardware platforms which does not support LPAE
>>> (eg Cortex-R52), u
On 24/04/2023 13:08, Michal Orzel wrote:
Hi Ayan,
Hi Michal,
A clarification.
On 13/04/2023 19:37, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
Some Arm based hardware platforms which does not support LPAE
(eg Cortex-R52), uses 32 bit physical addresses.
Also, users may choose to use 32 bits to represent p
Hi Ayan,
On 13/04/2023 19:37, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
>
>
> Some Arm based hardware platforms which does not support LPAE
> (eg Cortex-R52), uses 32 bit physical addresses.
> Also, users may choose to use 32 bits to represent physical addresses
> for optimization.
>
> To support the above use
On 13.04.2023 19:37, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -19,13 +19,46 @@ config ARM
> select HAS_PMAP
> select IOMMU_FORCE_PT_SHARE
>
> +menu "Architecture Features"
> +
> +choice
> + prompt "Physical address space size" if ARM_
Some Arm based hardware platforms which does not support LPAE
(eg Cortex-R52), uses 32 bit physical addresses.
Also, users may choose to use 32 bits to represent physical addresses
for optimization.
To support the above use cases, we have introduced arch independent
configs to choose if the physic
