Hi Nicola,
On 29/11/2023 10:32, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
The definitions of ffs{l}? violate Rule 10.1, by using the well-known
pattern (x & -x); its usage is wrapped by the ISOLATE_LSB macro.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
This is now comm
The definitions of ffs{l}? violate Rule 10.1, by using the well-known
pattern (x & -x); its usage is wrapped by the ISOLATE_LSB macro.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
---
Changes in v4:
- Changed macro name.
Changes in v5:
- Changed macro name
