On 27.05.2024 12:27, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> 23.05.24 17:50, Jan Beulich:
>> On 23.05.2024 15:07, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
>>> 16.05.24 14:12, Jan Beulich:
On 15.05.2024 11:12, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>
23.05.24 17:50, Jan Beulich:
On 23.05.2024 15:07, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
16.05.24 14:12, Jan Beulich:
On 15.05.2024 11:12, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ static inline bool boot_cpu_has(unsigned int f
On 24.05.2024 01:36, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.05.2024 15:07, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
>>> 16.05.24 14:12, Jan Beulich:
On 15.05.2024 11:12, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/as
On Thu, 23 May 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.05.2024 15:07, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> > 16.05.24 14:12, Jan Beulich:
> >> On 15.05.2024 11:12, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> >>> @@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ static inli
On 23.05.2024 15:07, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> 16.05.24 14:12, Jan Beulich:
>> On 15.05.2024 11:12, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
>>> @@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ static inline bool boot_cpu_has(unsigned int feat)
>>> #defin
16.05.24 14:12, Jan Beulich:
On 15.05.2024 11:12, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ static inline bool boot_cpu_has(unsigned int feat)
#define cpu_has_sse3boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SSE3)
#
On 15.05.2024 11:12, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ static inline bool boot_cpu_has(unsigned int feat)
> #define cpu_has_sse3boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SSE3)
> #define cpu_has_pclmulqdq
On Wed, 15 May 2024, Sergiy Kibrik wrote:
> As we now have SVM/VMX config options for enabling/disabling these features
> completely in the build, it may be feasible to add build-time checks to
> cpu_has_{svm,vmx} macros. These are used extensively thoughout HVM code, so
> we won't have to add extr
As we now have SVM/VMX config options for enabling/disabling these features
completely in the build, it may be feasible to add build-time checks to
cpu_has_{svm,vmx} macros. These are used extensively thoughout HVM code, so
we won't have to add extra #ifdef-s to check whether svm/vmx has been enabl