On 25.06.2024 09:44, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/24 16:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.06.2024 10:20, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>> On 2024/6/20 18:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
Alternatively we could maybe enable XEN_DOMCTL_getdomaininfo to permit
DOMID_SELF.
>>> It didn't permit DOMID_SELF since
On 2024/6/24 20:33, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 08:20:55AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/6/20 18:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 20.06.2024 11:40, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
On 2024/6/18 17:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.06.2024 10:23, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/
On 2024/6/24 16:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.06.2024 10:20, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/6/20 18:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 20.06.2024 11:40, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
On 2024/6/18 17:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.06.2024 10:23, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/6/17 23:32, Jan Beulich
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 08:20:55AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/20 18:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 20.06.2024 11:40, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> >> On 2024/6/18 17:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 18.06.2024 10:23, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/17 23:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 17.
On 21.06.2024 10:20, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/20 18:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.06.2024 11:40, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>> On 2024/6/18 17:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.06.2024 10:23, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/17 23:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen
On 2024/6/20 18:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.06.2024 11:40, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/6/18 17:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 18.06.2024 10:23, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
On 2024/6/17 23:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> @@ -1516,14 +1519,39 @@ static vo
On 20.06.2024 11:40, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/18 17:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 18.06.2024 10:23, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>> On 2024/6/17 23:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> @@ -1516,14 +1519,39 @@ static void pci_add_dm_done(libxl__egc *egc,
>
On 2024/6/18 17:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.06.2024 10:23, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/6/17 23:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote:
@@ -1516,14 +1519,39 @@ static void pci_add_dm_done(libxl__egc *egc,
rc = ERROR_FAIL;
goto
On 18.06.2024 10:23, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/17 23:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>>> @@ -1516,14 +1519,39 @@ static void pci_add_dm_done(libxl__egc *egc,
>>> rc = ERROR_FAIL;
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>> -r = xc_domai
On 2024/6/17 23:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> Some type of domain don't have PIRQs, like PVH, it doesn't do
>> PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq for each gsi. When passthrough a device
>> to guest base on PVH dom0, callstack
>> pci_add_dm_done->XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission will
On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> Some type of domain don't have PIRQs, like PVH, it doesn't do
> PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq for each gsi. When passthrough a device
> to guest base on PVH dom0, callstack
> pci_add_dm_done->XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission will fail at function
> domain_pirq_to_irq, becaus
Hi Daniel,
On 2024/6/17 17:00, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> Some type of domain don't have PIRQs, like PVH, it doesn't do
> PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq for each gsi. When passthrough a device
> to guest base on PVH dom0, callstack
> pci_add_dm_done->XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission will fail at function
> domain_pirq_to_
Some type of domain don't have PIRQs, like PVH, it doesn't do
PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq for each gsi. When passthrough a device
to guest base on PVH dom0, callstack
pci_add_dm_done->XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission will fail at function
domain_pirq_to_irq, because PVH has no mapping of gsi, pirq and
irq on Xen s
13 matches
Mail list logo
