Re: [XEN PATCH 06/12] x86/mm: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3

On 10/09/24 16:55, Jan Beulich wrote: On 10.09.2024 12:08, Federico Serafini wrote: Address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 16.3: "An unconditional `break' statement shall terminate every switch-clause". No functional change. Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini --- xen/arch/x86/mm/guest_walk.c

Re: [XEN PATCH 06/12] x86/mm: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3

On 10.09.2024 12:08, Federico Serafini wrote: > Address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 16.3: > "An unconditional `break' statement shall terminate every > switch-clause". > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini > --- > xen/arch/x86/mm/guest_walk.c | 1 + > xen/arch/x

[XEN PATCH 06/12] x86/mm: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3

Address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 16.3: "An unconditional `break' statement shall terminate every switch-clause". No functional change. Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini --- xen/arch/x86/mm/guest_walk.c | 1 + xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/hap.c| 2 +- xen/arch/x86/mm/hap/nested_hap.c |