On 2024-02-29 18:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.02.2024 17:45, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
On 2024-02-29 17:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.02.2024 16:27, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -179,9 +179,9 @@ void cleanup_domain_irq_mapping(st
On 29.02.2024 17:45, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 2024-02-29 17:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 29.02.2024 16:27, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
>>> @@ -179,9 +179,9 @@ void cleanup_domain_irq_mapping(struct domain *d);
>>> vo
On 2024-02-29 17:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.02.2024 16:27, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -179,9 +179,9 @@ void cleanup_domain_irq_mapping(struct domain *d);
void *__ret = radix_tree_lookup(&(d)->arch.hvm.emuirq_pirq,
em
On 29.02.2024 16:27, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/irq.h
> @@ -179,9 +179,9 @@ void cleanup_domain_irq_mapping(struct domain *d);
> void *__ret = radix_tree_lookup(&(d)->arch.hvm.emuirq_pirq, emuirq);\
> __ret ? radix_tree_pt
MISRA C Rule 20.7 states: "Expressions resulting from the expansion
of macro parameters shall be enclosed in parentheses". Therefore, some
macro definitions should gain additional parentheses to ensure that all
current and future users will be safe with respect to expansions that
can possibly alter
