On 21.06.2024 03:09, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.06.2024 11:49, Federico Serafini wrote:
>>> MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
>>> `default' label" and a statement or a comment prior to the
>>> terminating break stat
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.06.2024 11:49, Federico Serafini wrote:
> > MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
> > `default' label" and a statement or a comment prior to the
> > terminating break statement.
> >
> > This patch addresses some violatio
On 17/06/24 12:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.06.2024 11:49, Federico Serafini wrote:
MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
`default' label" and a statement or a comment prior to the
terminating break statement.
This patch addresses some violations of the rule relate
On 17.06.2024 11:49, Federico Serafini wrote:
> MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
> `default' label" and a statement or a comment prior to the
> terminating break statement.
>
> This patch addresses some violations of the rule related to the
> "notifier pattern":
MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
`default' label" and a statement or a comment prior to the
terminating break statement.
This patch addresses some violations of the rule related to the
"notifier pattern": a frequently-used pattern whereby only a few values
are ha
