Hi David,
"Woodhouse, David" writes:
> [[S/MIME Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 23:24 +, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
>> This patch makes legacy backends optional. As was discussed at [1]
>> this is a solution to a problem when we can't run QEMU as a device
>> model in a non-pr
On Fri, 2023-11-24 at 23:24 +, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> This patch makes legacy backends optional. As was discussed at [1]
> this is a solution to a problem when we can't run QEMU as a device
> model in a non-privileged domain. This is because legacy backends
> assume that they are always run
This patch makes legacy backends optional. As was discussed at [1]
this is a solution to a problem when we can't run QEMU as a device
model in a non-privileged domain. This is because legacy backends
assume that they are always running in domain with ID = 0. Actually,
this may prevent running QEMU
