Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/ioreq: guard VIO_realmode_completion with INTEL_VMX

2023-02-14 Thread Xenia Ragiadakou
On 2/14/23 18:46, Jan Beulich wrote: On 13.02.2023 15:57, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote: VIO_realmode_completion is specific to vmx realmode, so guard the completion handling code with INTEL_VMX. While it means slightly bigger a code change, personally I'd prefer if VIO_realmode_completion simply d

Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/ioreq: guard VIO_realmode_completion with INTEL_VMX

2023-02-14 Thread Jan Beulich
On 13.02.2023 15:57, Xenia Ragiadakou wrote: > VIO_realmode_completion is specific to vmx realmode, so guard the completion > handling code with INTEL_VMX. While it means slightly bigger a code change, personally I'd prefer if VIO_realmode_completion simply didn't exist as enumerator when !VMX. Be

[RFC 09/10] x86/ioreq: guard VIO_realmode_completion with INTEL_VMX

2023-02-13 Thread Xenia Ragiadakou
VIO_realmode_completion is specific to vmx realmode, so guard the completion handling code with INTEL_VMX. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Xenia Ragiadakou --- xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c b/xen/arch/x86/hv