On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 04:49:57PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:28:35PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > So I think we first need to figure out what is the offending node and
> > > why it is dt_device_get_address() is
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:28:35PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 21/12/2020 17:30, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > > I doubt this is the only bug exposed by
> > > 5a37207df52066efefe419c677b089a654d37afc.
> >
> > Are you saying that with my patch dropp
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:28:35PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 21/12/2020 17:30, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > I doubt this is the only bug exposed by
> > 5a37207df52066efefe419c677b089a654d37afc.
>
> Are you saying that with my patch dropped, Xen will boot but with it
> will not?
I thought th
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:28:35PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> I was planning to review the first version today, but as you sent a new
> version I will answer on this one directly.
Mostly the commentary has been increasing, not so much the commit.
> On 21/12/2020 17:30, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
Hi Elliott,
I was planning to review the first version today, but as you sent a new
version I will answer on this one directly.
On 21/12/2020 17:30, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
Previously Xen had stopped processing Device Trees if an empty
(size == 0) memory bank was found.
Commit 5a37207df52066
Previously Xen had stopped processing Device Trees if an empty
(size == 0) memory bank was found.
Commit 5a37207df52066efefe419c677b089a654d37afc changed this behavior to
ignore such banks. Unfortunately this means these empty nodes are
visible to code which accesses the device trees. Have domai
