On Thu, 2 Feb 2023, Paul Durrant wrote:
> On 01/02/2023 18:22, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing this and other patches in series.
> >
> > Please see my reply below.
> >
> > On 2/1/23 12:30 AM, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > On 31/01/2023 22:51, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> >
On 01/02/2023 18:22, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for reviewing this and other patches in series.
Please see my reply below.
On 2/1/23 12:30 AM, Paul Durrant wrote:
On 31/01/2023 22:51, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
Add a new machine xenpvh which creates a IOREQ server to
register/connect w
Hi Paul,
Thanks for reviewing this and other patches in series.
Please see my reply below.
On 2/1/23 12:30 AM, Paul Durrant wrote:
On 31/01/2023 22:51, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
Add a new machine xenpvh which creates a IOREQ server to
register/connect with
Xen Hypervisor.
Is this really the r
On 31/01/2023 22:51, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
Add a new machine xenpvh which creates a IOREQ server to register/connect with
Xen Hypervisor.
Is this really the right way? Is it not possible to do the Xen
initialization (including ioreq server registration) off the back of the
accelerator init (
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> Add a new machine xenpvh which creates a IOREQ server to register/connect with
> Xen Hypervisor.
>
> Optional: When CONFIG_TPM is enabled, it also creates a tpm-tis-device, adds a
> TPM emulator and connects to swtpm running on host machine via chardev
Add a new machine xenpvh which creates a IOREQ server to register/connect with
Xen Hypervisor.
Optional: When CONFIG_TPM is enabled, it also creates a tpm-tis-device, adds a
TPM emulator and connects to swtpm running on host machine via chardev socket
and support TPM functionalities for a guest do
