On 16.07.2025 09:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 16.07.2025 03:24, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> Heads up, I intend to commit this series shortly as it has been
>> thoroughly reviewed by multiple people and has been on the list for a
>> long time now.
>
> I would have already committed it if it had all
On 16.07.2025 03:24, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Heads up, I intend to commit this series shortly as it has been
> thoroughly reviewed by multiple people and has been on the list for a
> long time now.
I would have already committed it if it had all necessary acks. XSM ones
in particular are missi
Heads up, I intend to commit this series shortly as it has been
thoroughly reviewed by multiple people and has been on the list for a
long time now.
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025, Penny Zheng wrote:
> It can be beneficial for some dom0less systems to further reduce Xen footprint
> via disabling some hyperc
It can be beneficial for some dom0less systems to further reduce Xen footprint
via disabling some hypercalls handling code, which may not to be used &
required in such systems. Each hypercall has a separate option to keep
configuration flexible.
Options to disable hypercalls:
- sysctl
- domctl
- h
