On 18.07.2025 02:09, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> It looks like this patch is the only one missing an Ack. (Aside from
> patch #11).
I've sent an ack. Yet according to my records patch 1 also is still
lacking an (XSM) ack. Plus, to be honest, a ping after ...
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2025, Alejandro Valle
On 15.07.2025 18:10, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
Acked-by: Jan Beulich
Hi Jan,
It looks like this patch is the only one missing an Ack. (Aside from
patch #11).
Cheers,
Stefano
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c | 2 +-
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/boot-domain.h | 33 --
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/bootinfo.h| 1 -
xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c