On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 10:22 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.08.2024 10:57, Fouad Hilly wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:30 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 25.07.2024 10:27, Fouad Hilly wrote:
> >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
> >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
> >>> @@
On 19.08.2024 10:57, Fouad Hilly wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:30 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 25.07.2024 10:27, Fouad Hilly wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
>>> @@ -90,6 +90,11 @@ struct ucode_mod_blob {
>>> size_t size;
>>>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:30 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.07.2024 10:27, Fouad Hilly wrote:
> > --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc
> > +++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc
> > @@ -2650,7 +2650,7 @@ performance.
> > Alternatively, selecting `tsx=1` will re-enable TSX at the users own
On 25.07.2024 10:27, Fouad Hilly wrote:
> --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc
> +++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc
> @@ -2650,7 +2650,7 @@ performance.
> Alternatively, selecting `tsx=1` will re-enable TSX at the users own risk.
>
> ### ucode
> -> `= List of [ | scan=, nmi=, allow-
Pass xen-ucode flags to do low level checks on micorocde version and
utilize it to allow for microcode downgrade or reapply the same version of the
microcode.
ucode_force is required to be passed to a low level Intel and AMD for version
checks to be done.
While adding ucode_force, opt_ucode_allow_s
