Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm:
xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM."):
> IMO it would be good to modify the commit message so it covers the
> fact that the emulated host bridge on Arm does not advertise IO port
> support, so the
Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm:
xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM."):
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 01:42:22PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > I don't think it is about performance. From a performance point of view,
> > w
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 01:42:22PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2021, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Bertrand Marquis writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm:
> > xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM."):
> > > I can add something in
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 04:15:20PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> > On 12 Oct 2021, at 15:53, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >
> > Bertrand Marquis writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm:
> > xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM."):
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Bertrand Marquis writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm:
> xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM."):
> > I can add something in the commit message about the fact that we improve
> > performance and prevent to do
Bertrand Marquis writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm:
xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM."):
> I can add something in the commit message about the fact that we improve
> performance and prevent to do a call that is and will not be supported in Xen.
Thanks
Hi Ian,
> On 12 Oct 2021, at 15:53, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> Bertrand Marquis writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm:
> xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM."):
>> So there is no comment remaining on this patch ?
>
> I have been following this t
Bertrand Marquis writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] xen/arm:
xc_domain_ioport_permission(..) not supported on ARM."):
> So there is no comment remaining on this patch ?
I have been following this thread. I think I have a notion of why
this is needed but I'm not 100% clear on it.
On 12.10.2021 12:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> So there is no comment remaining on this patch ?
No, but the comments weren't on the patch anyway, but on a question
raised in the course of the discussion.
> Would it possible to get an ack on it ?
No, as I can't ack this patch: I'm not a maintaine
Hi Jan,
> On 12 Oct 2021, at 11:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 12.10.2021 12:06, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 12.10.21 13:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 12.10.2021 11:38, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 12.10.21 12:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The minimal thing I'd suggest (or maybe
On 12.10.2021 12:06, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 12.10.21 13:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.10.2021 11:38, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> On 12.10.21 12:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
The minimal thing I'd suggest (or maybe you're doing this already)
would be to expose such BARs to t
On 12.10.21 13:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.10.2021 11:38, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 12.10.21 12:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 12.10.2021 10:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2021, at 09:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 11.10.2021 19:11, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> On 1
On 12.10.2021 11:40, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
>> On 12 Oct 2021, at 10:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 12.10.2021 10:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
On 12 Oct 2021, at 09:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.10.2021 19:11, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 11 Oct 20
On 12.10.2021 11:38, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 12.10.21 12:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.10.2021 10:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
On 12 Oct 2021, at 09:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.10.2021 19:11, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
Hi Jan,
> On 12 Oct 2021, at 10:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 12.10.2021 10:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>>> On 12 Oct 2021, at 09:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11.10.2021 19:11, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Oct
On 12.10.21 12:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.10.2021 10:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>>> On 12 Oct 2021, at 09:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11.10.2021 19:11, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 02:16:19P
On 12.10.2021 10:41, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
>> On 12 Oct 2021, at 09:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 11.10.2021 19:11, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 02:16:19PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 11 Oc
Hi Jan,
> On 12 Oct 2021, at 09:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 11.10.2021 19:11, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 02:16:19PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:57, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> I thin
On 11.10.2021 19:11, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 02:16:19PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:57, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
I think the commit message needs to at least be expanded in order to
>>>
Hi Roger,
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 17:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 02:16:19PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:57, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:40:30PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 02:16:19PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> > On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:57, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:40:30PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> >> Hi Roger,
> >>
> >> + Oleksandr to have a better PCI expert then me.
> >>
> >>> On
Hi Roger,
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:57, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:40:30PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>> + Oleksandr to have a better PCI expert then me.
>>
>>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:11
Hi, all
On 11.10.21 16:40, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> + Oleksandr to have a better PCI expert then me.
>
>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:11:04PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
On 11 Oct 2021, at 12:47, Roger
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:40:30PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> + Oleksandr to have a better PCI expert then me.
>
> > On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:11:04PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> >> Hi Roger,
> >>
> >>> On 11 Oc
Hi Roger,
+ Oleksandr to have a better PCI expert then me.
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 14:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:11:04PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Hi Roger,
>>
>>> On 11 Oct 2021, at 12:47, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:27PM
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:11:04PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> > On 11 Oct 2021, at 12:47, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:27PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
> >> ARM architecture does not implement I/O ports. Ignore this call on ARM
> >> to avoid the
Hi Roger,
> On 11 Oct 2021, at 12:47, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:27PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> ARM architecture does not implement I/O ports. Ignore this call on ARM
>> to avoid the overhead of making a hypercall just for Xen to return
>> -ENOSYS.
>
> What is t
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:40:27PM +0100, Rahul Singh wrote:
> ARM architecture does not implement I/O ports. Ignore this call on ARM
> to avoid the overhead of making a hypercall just for Xen to return
> -ENOSYS.
What is the cal trace of this function actually on Arm?
AFAICT libxl will only call
ARM architecture does not implement I/O ports. Ignore this call on ARM
to avoid the overhead of making a hypercall just for Xen to return
-ENOSYS.
Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis
---
Change in v5: none
Change in v4:
- Added Reviewed-by: B
29 matches
Mail list logo
