On 01/04/2025 11:09 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/bitmap.c
> +++ b/xen/common/bitmap.c
> @@ -359,12 +343,11 @@ static void bitmap_byte_to_long(unsigned
>
> #elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
>
> -static void bitmap_long_to_byte(uint8_t *bp, const unsigned long *lp,
> -
On 02.04.2025 11:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 01/04/2025 11:09 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/common/bitmap.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/bitmap.c
>> @@ -359,12 +343,11 @@ static void bitmap_byte_to_long(unsigned
>>
>> #elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
>>
>> -static void bitmap_long_to_byte(uint8_t
On 02/04/2025 10:30 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.04.2025 11:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 01/04/2025 11:09 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/bitmap.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/bitmap.c
>>> @@ -359,12 +343,11 @@ static void bitmap_byte_to_long(unsigned
>>>
>>> #elif defined(__LITTLE_ENDIA
On 02.04.2025 11:36, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 02/04/2025 10:30 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 02.04.2025 11:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 01/04/2025 11:09 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
--- a/xen/common/bitmap.c
+++ b/xen/common/bitmap.c
@@ -359,12 +343,11 @@ static void bitmap_byte_to_long
On 02.04.2025 02:14, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> From: Stefano Stabellini
>>
>> The little endian implementation of bitmap_to_xenctl_bitmap leads to
>> unnecessary xmallocs and xfrees. Given that Xen only supports little
>> endian architectures, it is wort
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
> From: Stefano Stabellini
>
> The little endian implementation of bitmap_to_xenctl_bitmap leads to
> unnecessary xmallocs and xfrees. Given that Xen only supports little
> endian architectures, it is worth optimizing.
>
> This patch removes the need for th
From: Stefano Stabellini
The little endian implementation of bitmap_to_xenctl_bitmap leads to
unnecessary xmallocs and xfrees. Given that Xen only supports little
endian architectures, it is worth optimizing.
This patch removes the need for the xmalloc on little endian
architectures.
Remove cla
