> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 5:57 PM
>
> On 04.08.2020 15:42, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > From: Paul Durrant
> >
> > At the moment iommu_map() and iommu_unmap() take a page order but
> not a
> > count, whereas iommu_iotlb_flush() takes a count but not a page order.
> > This p
; Julien
> Grall ;
> Stefano Stabellini ; Volodymyr Babchuk
>
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v4 07/14] iommu: make map, unmap and flush all
> take both an order and a
> count
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or
On 04.08.2020 15:42, Paul Durrant wrote:
> From: Paul Durrant
>
> At the moment iommu_map() and iommu_unmap() take a page order but not a
> count, whereas iommu_iotlb_flush() takes a count but not a page order.
> This patch simply makes them consistent with each other.
Why can't we do with just
From: Paul Durrant
At the moment iommu_map() and iommu_unmap() take a page order but not a
count, whereas iommu_iotlb_flush() takes a count but not a page order.
This patch simply makes them consistent with each other.
Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant
---
Cc: Jun Nakajima
Cc: Kevin Tian
Cc: Jan Be
