On 22.11.21 10:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 15:09, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 19.11.21 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 19.11.2021 14:41, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 19.11.21 15:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>
On 19.11.2021 15:09, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 19.11.21 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.11.2021 14:41, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> On 19.11.21 15:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> @@ -95,10 +102,25 @@ int vpci_add_handlers(stru
On 19.11.21 15:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 14:41, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>
>> On 19.11.21 15:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
@@ -95,10 +102,25 @@ int vpci_add_handlers(struct pci_dev *pdev)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdev->v
On 19.11.2021 14:41, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>
>
> On 19.11.21 15:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> @@ -95,10 +102,25 @@ int vpci_add_handlers(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdev->vpci->handlers);
>>> spin_lock_init(&pd
On 19.11.21 15:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> @@ -95,10 +102,25 @@ int vpci_add_handlers(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdev->vpci->handlers);
>> spin_lock_init(&pdev->vpci->lock);
>>
>> +header = &pdev->vpci->header;
>
On 19.11.21 15:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 14:19, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>
>> On 19.11.21 15:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 19.11.2021 13:50, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 19.11.21 14:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 13:13, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 19.11.2021 14:19, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>
>
> On 19.11.21 15:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.11.2021 13:50, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> On 19.11.21 14:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.11.2021 13:13, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 19.11.21 14:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>
On 19.11.21 15:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 13:50, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 19.11.21 14:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 19.11.2021 13:13, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 19.11.21 14:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>
On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> @@ -95,10 +102,25 @@ int vpci_add_handlers(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pdev->vpci->handlers);
> spin_lock_init(&pdev->vpci->lock);
>
> +header = &pdev->vpci->header;
> +for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(header->bars); i
On 19.11.2021 13:50, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 19.11.21 14:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 19.11.2021 13:13, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> On 19.11.21 14:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
> Inst
On 19.11.21 14:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.11.2021 13:13, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> On 19.11.21 14:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Instead of handling a single range set, that contains all the
On 19.11.2021 13:13, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 19.11.21 14:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>>>
>>> Instead of handling a single range set, that contains all the memory
>>> regions of all the BARs and ROM, hav
On 19.11.21 14:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>>
>> Instead of handling a single range set, that contains all the memory
>> regions of all the BARs and ROM, have them per BAR.
> Iirc Roger did indicate agreement with
On 05.11.2021 07:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
>
> Instead of handling a single range set, that contains all the memory
> regions of all the BARs and ROM, have them per BAR.
Iirc Roger did indicate agreement with the spitting. May I nevertheless
ask that for
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Instead of handling a single range set, that contains all the memory
regions of all the BARs and ROM, have them per BAR.
This is in preparation of making non-identity mappings in p2m for the
MMIOs/ROM.
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
---
Since v3:
- re-wor
15 matches
Mail list logo