On 27.06.2024 14:02, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> On Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 10:42 AM BST, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Plus what about a guest which was configured to have the CPUID bit for MTRRs
>> clear?
>> I think we ought to document this as not supported for PVH (we may
>
> By "this" do you mean PVH _mus
On Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 10:42 AM BST, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 26.06.2024 18:28, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> > This greatly simplifies a later patch that makes use of HVM contexts to
> > upload
> > LAPIC data. The idea is to reuse MTRR setting procedure to avoid code
> > duplication. It's currently o
On 26.06.2024 18:28, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> This greatly simplifies a later patch that makes use of HVM contexts to upload
> LAPIC data. The idea is to reuse MTRR setting procedure to avoid code
> duplication. It's currently only used for PVH, but there's no real reason to
> overcomplicate the
This greatly simplifies a later patch that makes use of HVM contexts to upload
LAPIC data. The idea is to reuse MTRR setting procedure to avoid code
duplication. It's currently only used for PVH, but there's no real reason to
overcomplicate the toolstack preventing them being set for HVM too when
h
