On 15.06.2023 16:04, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 9:21 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Yet then I find this approach a little odd anyway. I think the
>> registration attempts would better be suppressed, thus also not
>> resulting in (apparently) failed init-calls. Especially for the
>>
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 9:21 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 14.06.2023 20:02, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > @@ -121,6 +122,12 @@ int __init cpufreq_register_governor(struct
> > cpufreq_governor *governor)
> > if (!governor)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > +if (cpufreq_governor_internal &&
On 14.06.2023 20:02, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> @@ -121,6 +122,12 @@ int __init cpufreq_register_governor(struct
> cpufreq_governor *governor)
> if (!governor)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> +if (cpufreq_governor_internal && !governor->internal)
> +return -EINVAL;
> +
> +if (!cp
For hwp, the standard governors are not usable, and only the internal
one is applicable. Add the cpufreq_governor_internal boolean to
indicate when an internal governor, like hwp, will be used.
This is set during presmp_initcall, so that it can suppress governor
registration during initcall. Add
