Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Follow-up static shared memory PART I

Thanks for the reminder! I’ll send the updated version ASAP :) Thanks, Penny > 在 2023年11月30日，18:09，Michal Orzel 写道： > > Hi Penny, > >> On 11/09/2023 12:04, Penny Zheng wrote: >> >> >> Hi Michal >> >>> On 2023/9/11 17:01, Michal Orzel wrote: >>> Hi Penny, >>> >>> On 11/09/2023 06:04, Penny

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Follow-up static shared memory PART I

Hi Penny, On 11/09/2023 12:04, Penny Zheng wrote: > > > Hi Michal > > On 2023/9/11 17:01, Michal Orzel wrote: >> Hi Penny, >> >> On 11/09/2023 06:04, Penny Zheng wrote: >>> >>> >>> There are some unsolving issues on current 4.17 static shared memory >>> feature[1], including: >>> - In order to

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Follow-up static shared memory PART I

Hi Michal On 2023/9/11 17:01, Michal Orzel wrote: Hi Penny, On 11/09/2023 06:04, Penny Zheng wrote: There are some unsolving issues on current 4.17 static shared memory feature[1], including: - In order to avoid keeping growing 'membank', having the shared memory info in separate structures

Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Follow-up static shared memory PART I

Hi Penny, On 11/09/2023 06:04, Penny Zheng wrote: > > > There are some unsolving issues on current 4.17 static shared memory > feature[1], including: > - In order to avoid keeping growing 'membank', having the shared memory > info in separate structures is preferred. > - Missing implementation o

[PATCH v4 00/10] Follow-up static shared memory PART I

There are some unsolving issues on current 4.17 static shared memory feature[1], including: - In order to avoid keeping growing 'membank', having the shared memory info in separate structures is preferred. - Missing implementation on having the host address optional in "xen,shared-mem" property - R