On 15.11.2024 11:27, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 3:04 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 14.11.2024 15:02, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 2:52 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
On 19.08.2024 16:29, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> ++
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 3:04 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 14.11.2024 15:02, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 2:52 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> On 19.08.2024 16:29, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> >>> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> >>> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> >>> @@ -287,19 +287,
On 14.11.2024 15:02, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 2:52 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 19.08.2024 16:29, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>>> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>>> @@ -287,19 +287,36 @@ static bool __init match_guid(const EFI_GUID *guid1,
>>> cons
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 2:52 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 19.08.2024 16:29, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> > @@ -287,19 +287,36 @@ static bool __init match_guid(const EFI_GUID *guid1,
> > const EFI_GUID *guid2)
> > /* generic routine for p
On 19.08.2024 16:29, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> @@ -287,19 +287,36 @@ static bool __init match_guid(const EFI_GUID *guid1,
> const EFI_GUID *guid2)
> /* generic routine for printing error messages */
> static void __init PrintErrMesg(cons
On 26.09.2024 16:11, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 26/09/2024 2:26 pm, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>>> Although code is compiled with -fpic option data is not position
>>> independent. This causes data pointer to become invalid i
On 26/09/2024 2:26 pm, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>> Although code is compiled with -fpic option data is not position
>> independent. This causes data pointer to become invalid if
>> code is not relocated properly which is wh
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 03:29:52PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> Although code is compiled with -fpic option data is not position
> independent. This causes data pointer to become invalid if
> code is not relocated properly which is what happens for
> efi_multiboot2 which is called by multiboot e
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 10:03 AM Frediano Ziglio
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 3:30 PM Frediano Ziglio
> wrote:
> >
> > Although code is compiled with -fpic option data is not position
> > independent. This causes data pointer to become invalid if
> > code is not relocated properly which is w
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 3:30 PM Frediano Ziglio
wrote:
>
> Although code is compiled with -fpic option data is not position
> independent. This causes data pointer to become invalid if
> code is not relocated properly which is what happens for
> efi_multiboot2 which is called by multiboot entry co
Although code is compiled with -fpic option data is not position
independent. This causes data pointer to become invalid if
code is not relocated properly which is what happens for
efi_multiboot2 which is called by multiboot entry code.
Code tested adding
PrintErrMesg(L"Test message", EFI_BUFFE
11 matches
Mail list logo
