Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] xen/arm/gic: Allow routing/removing interrupt to running VMs

Hi Julien, Stefano, On 5/22/2024 9:03 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Henry, On 22/05/2024 02:22, Henry Wang wrote: Also, while looking at the locking, I noticed that we are not doing anything with GIC_IRQ_GUEST_MIGRATING. In gic_update_one_lr(), we seem to assume that if the flag is set, then p-

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] xen/arm/gic: Allow routing/removing interrupt to running VMs

Hi Henry, On 22/05/2024 02:22, Henry Wang wrote: On 5/22/2024 9:16 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 22 May 2024, Henry Wang wrote: Hi Julien, On 5/21/2024 8:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 21/05/2024 05:35, Henry Wang wrote: diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vg

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] xen/arm/gic: Allow routing/removing interrupt to running VMs

Hi Stefano, On 5/22/2024 9:16 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 22 May 2024, Henry Wang wrote: Hi Julien, On 5/21/2024 8:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 21/05/2024 05:35, Henry Wang wrote: diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c index 56490dbc43..956c11ba13 1006

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] xen/arm/gic: Allow routing/removing interrupt to running VMs

On Wed, 22 May 2024, Henry Wang wrote: > Hi Julien, > > On 5/21/2024 8:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 21/05/2024 05:35, Henry Wang wrote: > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c > > > index 56490dbc43..956c11ba13 100644 > > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] xen/arm/gic: Allow routing/removing interrupt to running VMs

Hi Julien, On 5/21/2024 8:30 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 21/05/2024 05:35, Henry Wang wrote: diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c index 56490dbc43..956c11ba13 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-vgic.c @@ -439,24 +439,33 @@ int vgic_connect_

Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] xen/arm/gic: Allow routing/removing interrupt to running VMs

Hi, On 21/05/2024 05:35, Henry Wang wrote: From: Vikram Garhwal Currently, routing/removing physical interrupts are only allowed at the domain creation/destroy time. For use cases such as dynamic device tree overlay adding/removing, the routing/removing of physical IRQ to running domains shoul

[PATCH v3 5/8] xen/arm/gic: Allow routing/removing interrupt to running VMs

From: Vikram Garhwal Currently, routing/removing physical interrupts are only allowed at the domain creation/destroy time. For use cases such as dynamic device tree overlay adding/removing, the routing/removing of physical IRQ to running domains should be allowed. Removing the above-mentioned do