On Tue Jun 17, 2025 at 3:22 AM CEST, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>
> On 6/13/25 11:13, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> Create a struct header within kernel_info with the contents common to
>> kernel_info and boot_domain, and define that header in common code. This
>> enables
>> x86 to use that header as-is
On 6/13/25 11:13, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
Create a struct header within kernel_info with the contents common to
kernel_info and boot_domain, and define that header in common code. This enables
x86 to use that header as-is and drop x86's boot_domain
IMHO kernel_info is an extremely poor name
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> Create a struct header within kernel_info with the contents common to
> kernel_info and boot_domain, and define that header in common code. This
> enables
> x86 to use that header as-is and drop x86's boot_domain.
>
> Not a functional change.
>
> S
Create a struct header within kernel_info with the contents common to
kernel_info and boot_domain, and define that header in common code. This enables
x86 to use that header as-is and drop x86's boot_domain.
Not a functional change.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo
---
v3:
* s/bootdomain/boot_