On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 11:51:37AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 05:42:50PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > It's effectively redundant with vmx_basic_msr. For the #define
> > replacement to work, struct vmcs_struct's respective field name also
> > needs to change: Drop the n
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 05:42:50PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> It's effectively redundant with vmx_basic_msr. For the #define
> replacement to work, struct vmcs_struct's respective field name also
> needs to change: Drop the not really meaningful "vmcs_" prefix from it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beul
It's effectively redundant with vmx_basic_msr. For the #define
replacement to work, struct vmcs_struct's respective field name also
needs to change: Drop the not really meaningful "vmcs_" prefix from it.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
v2: New.
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86